Raiders and Cardinals (possible trades)

I know Khalil Mack was named not tradable but I've got something that may change that. What if I offer Mack 85ovr + Rod Streater 80ovr for Larry Fitzgerald 91 ovr and a 2nd round pick? As the Raiders I have shown a dominant pass defense and when you look at the stats Mack has not done much. My offense is a different story, dropped passes after dropped passes. I'm having to rest my fate on my defense (mainly My D-Line). Raiders entered this year as a rebuilding team but has proved to be more than that. Now my question is why is Mack not tradable? It's basically just like trading a good first round pick. Trent Richardson was traded rookie year....
As for the Cardinals they need youth! Rod Streater a very inconsistent but young WR is a great addition for their rebuilding.
So Mack may be the best LB in a couple years but so could that 2nd round pick.... Streater may have a future. And Larry will be a good addition to get in the playoffs.

denied.

fitzgerald while legit, is an aging wide reciever. Mack is already(in madden at least) a legit threat n super young. Each team has a few players that just should not leave.

and f.y.i trent richardson was traded from browns to colts beginning of 2nd year so that was a bad example.

if anything, MAYBE if it was fitz n a 1st round due to fitz aging a mack being the 4th overall pick....if u guys agree to that id still b against it but would converse with icky b4 i made a final decision

Sorry, fellas. I gotta agree with the Doctor on this one. I still think it would be possible to move Mack for the right deal, however this just isnt a trade i can see getting approved.

Mack was 5th pick so bad example

what a tool. make a deal thats a worthwhile deal or dont waste my time. ive told u already i dont see a deal where mack moves....so prove me wrong or stop whining n win games.

He apologized afterwards, he's cool man. Just a lil heated it aint go through

understandable, yet everyone in league is mature right?

all he needs to do is debate politely. the t-rich comment wasnt bein a dick, just pointing out that the example made no sense. the reply of "mack was 5th so bad example" is pure douche status...not a good look

Yeah, it was bad but they tryna rework the trade so hopefully they'll come with a better trade.